|
Still Dreaming but Still Learning to Create Positive Climates for Leaders |
Saturday, May 23, 2015 |
1:00 PM–1:50 PM |
207AB (CC) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Judi Komaki, Ph.D. |
Chair: Mark A. Mattaini (Jane Addams College of Social Work-University of Illinois at Chicago) |
JUDI KOMAKI (New York) |
Wes Becker's graph of students Edward and Elmer changing from aimless wandering to completing assignments was Dr. Judi Komaki's introduction to applied behavior analysis. That was at Illinois in 1968. Seven years later, teaching work motivation (part time) in Georgia Tech's business school, she shifted to working adults. Without proper management support, however, Dr. Komaki learned programs would be doomed to failure. Leaders became her focus when joining the industrial/organizational psychology faculty at Purdue University and the City University of New York. After tracking leaders in darkened theaters and aboard racing boats, she formulated an operant leadership model, highlighting performance monitoring especially work sampling and positive consequences. Writing plays forced her to confront the sometimes pernicious impact of bias, which in turn propelled her to promote social and economic justice. Besides 40-plus articles and chapters, she's the proud author of a leadership book, an off-off Broadway play, and an article daring to pursue the dreams of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. Komaki has served on editorial boards of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, and Leadership Quarterly. Awarded contracts by the Office of Naval Research, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, and the Army Research Institute, she is now an ARI Fellow striving to prevent sexual harassment and assault. |
Abstract: Baer, Wolf, and Risley (1968) audaciously aspired to making a difference. Modestly, however, they encouraged a "self-evaluating, discovery-oriented" process. This learning stance helps to enable the dreams of Dr. Judi Komaki. She'll talk about just two. Curious how an inner city public high school managed to maintain a graduation rate of 95%, Dr. Komaki shadowed a gifted principal for three semesters. She saw how he stealthily created a safe, supportive climate, which enticed the students to attend and their dedicated teachers to remain. Just as critical, however, she learned how the chancellor created a supportive climate, empowering and establishing full-throated organizational metrics and incentives for principals. Currently, Dr. Komaki is trying to prevent sexual assault in the United States Army. Initially stymied, she finally figured out how we as behavior analysts reduced workplace accidents by reinforcing the positive (safety). If cultures could be created in which team members ferociously protect one another, assaults would drop. Team culture clearly needs to be bolstered. But just as important, given the severe under-reporting of assault, the challenge is to help busy commanders motivate junior officers by providing timely information and feedback about whether their team is on the right track. Imagine if we could ensure that only leaders successful at building positive climates were promoted. |
Target Audience: Master's and post-masters behavior analysts and psychologists. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants should be able to: (1) describe for an interested school superintendent how a gifted high school principal was empowered and measured in his quest to maintain a graduation rate of 95% and how the principal created a safe, supportive climate which enabled two pillars of educational reform, enticing inner city minority students to come to school and their talented teachers to stay; (2) persuasively show why a behavioral approach to preventing sexual assault might be a viable approach on college campuses. Use as an example the positive approach we behavior analysts sometimes use to reduce undesired workplace accidents and disruptive classroom behavior; and (3) identify the best team you have ever been on and the leader(s) of that team. Specify in behavioral terms what you liked about the leader(s). Now assume that you are in charge of the organization and would like to foster those behaviors in other leaders. Identify what if any changes you would make to the organization's measurement of leaders. |
Keyword(s): leadership, school climate, sexual assault |
|
|
|
|
Functional Analysis and Intervention in Mainstream Schools: What Lessons do we Still Need to Learn? |
Saturday, May 23, 2015 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
Lila Cockrell Theatre (CC) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Jennifer L. Austin, Ph.D. |
Chair: Cynthia M. Anderson (Appalachian State University) |
JENNIFER L. AUSTIN (University of South Wales) |
Jennifer L. Austin, Ph.D., BCBA-D, has been applying the science of behavior analysis to improve outcomes for children and their teachers for nearly 20 years. Both her research and clinical work focus on how behavior analytic assessment and intervention strategies can be applied with typically developing children, as well as examining what adaptations may be necessary for making our science "work" in mainstream classrooms. She has worked with numerous schools in the United States and the United Kingdom, focusing primarily on those in disadvantaged communities. Dr. Austin received her Ph.D. from the Florida State University and currently serves as principal lecturer in psychology at the University of South Wales, where she leads the Behaviour Analysis Unit and directs the undergraduate and postgraduate programs in behavior analysis. Before moving to the United Kingdom, Dr. Austin served on the faculty at the University of South Florida; California State University, Fresno; and the University of Houston-Clear Lake. She is the past president of the UK Society for Behaviour Analysis and a former associate editor of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Behavior Analysis in Practice. |
Abstract: Challenging behavior continues to plague both primary and secondary schools, despite a raft of educational and governmental policies to tackle it. The need for practical, relevant, and evidence-based strategies for analyzing and treating these behaviors has never been more pressing than it is today. Behavior analysis certainly has much to offer with regard to helping schools solve problems and achieve the goals set for both students and teachers. However, our literature has tended to focus less on applications of our science to typically developing children and adolescents, so there is still much we don't know about the nuances of working with these populations. This presentation will address some of the challenges associated with applying functional analysis and intervention strategies in mainstream classrooms, as well as delineating some possible solutions derived from both research and clinical practice. Further, it will suggest some research questions that may be important if behavior analysis is to fulfill its promise to mainstream students, their parents, and their teachers. |
Keyword(s): function-based intervention, functional analysis, schools |
|
|
|
|
Conducting In-Home Functional Analyses and Functional Communication Training via Telehealth |
Saturday, May 23, 2015 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
Grand Ballroom C3 (CC) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: David P. Wacker, Ph.D. |
Chair: Mark D. Shriver (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
DAVID P. WACKER (The University of Iowa) |
Dr. David P. Wacker is a professor of pediatric psychology at the University of Iowa Children's Hospital, where he directs the biobehavioral outpatient service. He is the co-principal investigator of National Institute of Mental Health and Maternal and Child Health grants that have funded telehealth research programs for young children with autism who engage in problem behaviors at home. The initial results of these projects, which involved conducting functional analysis and functional communication training via telehealth in outpatient clinic settings, were recently published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. The most recent project involves conducting these same procedures directly in the home. Dr. Wacker is a former editor of JABA and was president of the Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior board. He is a Fellow of ABAI and of Divisions 25 and 22 of APA. |
Abstract: This talk will provide a summary of results obtained from a Maternal and Child Health-funded project in which functional analyses and functional communication training (FCT) were conducted in the homes of young children with autism who engaged in problem behaviors. All procedures were conducted by parents with live coaching from applied behavior analysts. Functional analyses were conducted within multielement designs, and FCT was conducted within reversal designs and as part of a randomized clinical trial. Inter-observer agreement was conducted on 30% of sessions. The talk will begin with a brief summary of previously funded inVIVO and telehealth projects using the same procedures and will then focus on the current in-home telehealth procedures. Video clips will highlight individual cases and group summaries will be provided for the assessment and treatment results. |
Target Audience: Practitioners and applied behavior analysts. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the event, participants should be able to: (1) describe how a standard functional analysis is modified when conducted via telehealth in the homes of young children with autism; (2) indicate how FCT is conducted via telehealth; and (3) describe how single case design is blended within a randomized clinical trial. |
Keyword(s): autism, functional analysis, functional communication, telehealth |
|
|
|
|
Promoting Sustainable Culture Through Behavior Analytic Theory and Practice |
Saturday, May 23, 2015 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
203AB (CC) |
Area: CSE/TPC; Domain: Theory |
Chair: Angela Sanguinetti (University of California, Irvine) |
CE Instructor: Angela Sanguinetti, Ph.D. |
Panelists: SIGRID S. GLENN (University of North Texas), ANTHONY BIGLAN (Oregon Research Institute), ROBERT GILMAN (Context Institute) |
Abstract: This panel composed of experts in cultural analysis invites you to engage with them in a discussion on the timely and critical topic of promoting sustainable cultures. Three speakers will bring profound and innovative insights pertaining to both theoretical grappling with and applied undertaking of the behavioral change initiatives required to build a more sustainable society. With their macro perspectives and breadth and diversity of expertise, these panelists can identify high leverage strategies for some of the most socially relevant behaviors in the realms of education, therapy, organizational behavior, community interventions, and basic research. Specific discussion points may include the compatibility and complementarity of the speakers' respective theories regarding cultural analysis; the current status of behavior analytic conceptual frameworks of cultural analysis, their relevance in promoting sustainability, and identification of important areas of continued development; and how applied behavior analysts can promote positive cultural change in various realms of practice where the relevance to sustainability is often overlooked. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Target Audience: Psychologists, behavior analysts, practitioners, and graduate students. |
Learning Objectives: Forthcoming |
SIGRID S. GLENN (University of North Texas) |
Dr. Sigrid Glenn's passionate commitment to the future of behavior analysis has resulted in numerous contributions to her chosen field. She has co-authored four books and more than 45 articles and book chapters. Although her early research was mainly in applied areas, she is widely recognized for her later conceptual work on selection at behavioral and cultural levels. As founding chair of the Department of Behavior Analysis at the University of North Texas, Dr. Glenn established master's and bachelor's degree programs in behavior analysis, leading the faculty in the first accreditation of a graduate program by ABAI. With characteristic prescience about important developments in the field, Dr. Glenn, a charter certificant of the Behavior Analysis Certification Board (BACB), also led the faculty in developing the first Internet sequence of behavior analysis courses approved by the BACB. Dr. Glenn has served as editor of The Behavior Analyst and on the editorial boards of several other journals. She is a former president of ABAI (1993-1994), a fellow of Division 25 of the American Psychological Association, and Regents Professor of Behavior Analysis at the University of North Texas. |
ANTHONY BIGLAN (Oregon Research Institute) |
Anthony Biglan, Ph.D. is a senior scientist at Oregon Research Institute and the co-director of the Promise Neighborhood Research Consortium. He has been conducting research on the development and prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior for the past 30 years. His work has included studies of the risk and protective factors associated with tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use; high-risk sexual behavior; and antisocial behavior. He has conducted numerous experimental evaluations of interventions to prevent tobacco use both through school-based programs and community-wide interventions. And, he has evaluated interventions to prevent high-risk sexual behavior, antisocial behavior, and reading failure. In recent years, his work has shifted to more comprehensive interventions that have the potential to prevent the entire range of child and adolescent problems. He and colleagues at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences published a book summarizing the epidemiology, cost, etiology, prevention, and treatment of youth with multiple problems (Biglan et al., 2004). He is a former president of the Society for Prevention Research. He was a member of the Institute of Medicine Committee on Prevention, which recently released its report documenting numerous evidence-based preventive interventions that can prevent multiple problems. As a member of Oregon's Alcohol and Drug Policy Commission, he has helped to develop a strategic plan for implementing comprehensive evidence-based interventions throughout Oregon. |
ROBERT GILMAN (Context Institute) |
Dr. Robert C. Gilman, Ph.D., is president of the Context Institute and founding editor of IN CONTEXT, A Quarterly of Humane Sustainable Culture. He received his bachelor's degree in astronomy from the University of California at Berkeley in 1967 and his Ph.D. in astrophysics from Princeton University in 1969. He taught and did research at the University of Minnesota, the Harvard Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and served as a Research Associate at NASA's Institute for Space Studies. In the mid-1970s, he turned his attention to the study of global sustainability, futures research and strategies for positive cultural change. His ongoing work draws on all the phases of his life as he works toward a humane and sustainable future. |
Keyword(s): sustainability |
|
|
|
|
Don Baer Invited Address: Fifty Years of Behavioral Parent Training Research: A Look Back and a Look Forward |
Saturday, May 23, 2015 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Lila Cockrell Theatre (CC) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Karen S. Budd, Ph.D. |
Chair: Mark D. Shriver (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
KAREN S. BUDD (DePaul University) |
Karen S. Budd, Ph.D., is professor emerita of psychology at DePaul University, where she was on the clinical psychology faculty for 22 years. From 2005 to 2014, she also directed the Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Program at DePaul’s Family and Community Services. Prior to joining DePaul, Dr. Budd held faculty positions at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (1975-1986) and Illinois Institute of Technology (1986-1992). Budd obtained her doctoral degree at the University of Kansas in child and developmental psychology under the mentorship of Donald M. Baer, and she later completed post-doctoral retraining in clinical psychology. Dr. Budd’s research and practice interests focus on prevention and intervention approaches for young children with disruptive behavior problems, with a primary interest in parenting. She has published more than 75 peer-reviewed research articles and book chapters and authored three books: Children’s Feeding Disorders: Biobehavioral Assessment and Intervention, A Small Matter of Proof: The Legacy of Donald M. Baer, and Evaluation of Parenting Capacity in Child Protection. She was awarded two fellowships as a Fulbright Senior Scholar, one in Prague, Czech Republic, (2004) and a second in Kathmandu, Nepal, (2014). In 2014, Budd received the Via Sapientiae Award, DePaul’s highest honor for faculty and staff, for her lifetime of service to the purposes and ideals of DePaul University. |
Abstract: The field of behavioral parent training began in the 1960s and has become one of the predominant empirically based clinical approaches for addressing child behavior problems and developmental delays. Three historical trends spurred the initial development of parent training: concerns about the ineffectiveness of traditional child therapy, the burgeoning growth of behavior modification, and the idea that using parents to deliver mental health services could enhance the effectiveness of therapy. Early parent training research focused on small studies examining the effects of various treatment components and training strategies based on learning principles. Subsequent trends involved the development of standardized intervention models and research on their effectiveness; examinations of generalization; and applications of parent training in areas beyond child disruptive behavior or delayed development. Despite the phenomenal growth of behavioral parent training, research has identified challenges related to parent engagement/dropout, differing responsiveness across diverse cultural and demographic groups, and the need for high quality training and supervision of practitioners. These issues constitute important current and future research directions. This presentation will provide an overview of behavioral parent training research across the decades using illustrative examples and will discuss the implications of this research for practitioners working with children and their families. |
Target Audience: Practitioners, applied researchers, educators, and mental health professionals. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants should be able to: (1) describe major topics of behavioral parent training research during the past 50 years; (2) list three or more evidence-based models of behavioral parent training and their intended target populations; and (3) name four ingredients of behavioral parent training that research has shown are associated with more successful parent and child outcomes. |
Keyword(s): empirically-based practice, parent training |
|
|
|
|
Hello, Teacher: Evidence-Based Teaching and Behavior Analysis Today |
Saturday, May 23, 2015 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
207AB (CC) |
Area: TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Nicole Luke, Ph.D. |
Chair: Nicole Luke (Surrey Place Centre) |
MATTHEW C. BELL (Santa Clara University) |
Matthew C. Bell earned his B.S. in psychology from the University of New Mexico and his M.A. and Ph.D. in experimental psychology at the University of California, San Diego. Following work as a postdoctoral scientist at the Center for Behavioral Teratology at San Diego State University, he joined the Santa Clara University Psychology Department in 2001, where is he now an associate professor. As an experimental psychologist (really a behavior analyst), he studies conditioned reinforcement, choice behavior, and persistence using pigeons as subjects and also collaborates with Dr. Patti Simone at Santa Clara University studying remembering in older adults. He has been teaching college courses for more than 15 years, including a course in the experimental analysis of behavior, and has an ongoing interest in evidence-based teaching to improve student learning. He has been working to evaluate a number of approaches to improve classroom pedagogy, including interteaching and publisher-provided online course modules. Some of his professional service activities include serving on the board of editors for the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior and a recently completed term as one of two experimental analysis of behavior area co-coordinators for the Association for Behavior Analysis International. |
Abstract: Behavior analysis has a long tradition of excellence in teaching that appears, currently, to be largely overlooked by mainstream psychology. As a new teacher, Dr. Matthew C. Bell, too, initially ignored this literature and followed the time-honored method of lecturing. Recently, however, he has been reflecting upon how and what he teaches, particularly when he teaches courses in learning. His own interest comes, not coincidentally, at a time when teaching effectiveness has seen renewed attention including the development of MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses), a push for more university-led online courses, flipped classrooms, a new American Psychological Association journal on the scholarship of teaching and learning, and a growing literature in cognitive psychology applying the findings from the experimental memory literature to the classroom. What exactly is the best way to teach a college course to maximize student learning? What exactly should students be learning in a course on learning? Serving as a case study, Dr. Bell will address this question and describe teaching his own upper-division learning course, including what and how he teaches, the contingencies affecting his teaching behavior, and the rationale for his approach. |
Keyword(s): experimental literature, university teaching |
|
|